View from City Road: Construction industry needs rules on payment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Latham report on the construction industry is another worthy tome that seems destined to highlight but do little to solve its intractable problems.
That something needs to be done about one of the country's biggest yet least profitable industries is not in doubt. But what is required is more than the well-meaning tinkering with contracts suggested by the report.
At the root of the problem is the industry's habit of making tenders below cost in the belief that profits can be chiselled out later through the lawyers. That is no way to run a sensible business.
Yet until clients buy on the basis of quality and value rather than price alone, contractors will continue to tender on an unrealistic basis. Unfortunately that is up to the market to decide, not the Government - except in so far as it is the industry's biggest customer.
What the Government can do is impose prompt payment requirements to prevent the industry's small-fry providing cash flow for larger businesses. This often leads the smaller more efficient companies to go out of business, in poorer times, while the big less efficient companies are supported by their bankers. Worrying about training, public image and the rest will remain an expensive luxury until such issues are tackled.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments