Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Government rejects proposals to prevent UK companies using Uyghur slave labour

Ministers refuse to strengthen rules or to ensure government procurement is not tainted by forced labour

Ben Chapman
Thursday 10 June 2021 01:00 BST
Comments
The government said that the evidence points to to “a highly disturbing programme of repression in Xinjiang and the world cannot simply look the other way”
The government said that the evidence points to to “a highly disturbing programme of repression in Xinjiang and the world cannot simply look the other way” (AFP via Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The government has rejected MPs proposals to prevent companies sourcing goods made by Uyghur slave labour in China.

Responding to plans put forward by the Business Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, the government said that the evidence points to to “a highly disturbing programme of repression in Xinjiang and the world cannot simply look the other way”.

However, ministers refused to commit to actions to strengthen the UK’s rules on modern slavery or to ensure that its own procurement process is not tainted by forced labour.

During the pandemic, the government has purchased personal protective equipment (PPE) from companies facing modern slavery allegations.

Products made in labour camps by Uyghur communities is China's Xinjiang province have found their way into European and American markets, prompting calls for tougher action to make companies more accountable for what they buy and where it comes from.

MPs on the BEIS committee urged ministers in March to strengthen the Modern Slavery Act and provide for civil penalties for companies that do not comply.

The Act requires companies with a turnover of at least £36m per year to publish annual statements detailing the risks of slavery and human trafficking in their supply chains. Currently there are no penalties available for non-compliance.

Nusrat Ghani, Conservative MP for Wealden and lead BEIS Committee member for the forced labour inquiry, said the government’s response was "deeply disheartening".

Ms Ghani said: "Given the horrifying evidence of abuses, it beggars belief the government is dragging its feet in bringing forward the tough action needed to help to tackle the exploitation of forced labour in Xinjiang.

“The BEIS Committee’s original report [in March] brought forward a series of practical recommendations to ensure every effort is made to stamp out profiteering from these abuses.

"There continues to be a disturbing lack of coherence and urgency in the Business department’s work on forced labour.

"The government’s response fails to provide reassurance to customers that they aren’t contributing to supply chains tainted by modern slavery and lets down British businesses who are trying to do the right thing and ensure their supply chains don’t profit from forced labour.

She added: "At the very least you would expect the Government to ensure that its procurement process is free of slave labour and I will push for a Uyghur genocide Government Procurement black-list."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in