Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US court action hits Glaxo share price: British company 'confident of winning' battle over patents

Neil Thapar,Chief City Reporter
Monday 02 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SHARES in Glaxo fell 131 2 p to 534p in a rising market yesterday after the company confirmed that it was facing allegations of 'inequitable conduct' in a US court case challenging patents for Zantac, its biggest selling drug.

The allegation forms part of a legal defence by Novopharm, a Canadian manufacturer being sued by Glaxo over plans to market a generic ulcer remedy. The case, opening in North Carolina next week, is expected to last two weeks although the outcome will not be known until later this year.

Glaxo, chaired by Sir Paul Girolami, claims that Novopharm's plans are an infringement of its Form 2 patent for ranitidine hydrochloride, used to make Zantac, which accounted for a large proportion of Glaxo's pounds 1.43bn taxable profits last year.

Glaxo owns both the original and the Form 2 version which formed the basis of Zantac's development. However, patents for the first version are due to expire in December 1995, leading to widespread fears among investors of a flood of cheaper products from Glaxo's rivals.

However, the British company believes that Novopharm's planned drug is based on its Form 2 patent, which does not expire until 2002.

Novopharm is counter-claiming that the Form 2 version is 'inherent' in the basic patent and therefore not new. It also alleges that Glaxo misled the US Patents office in its application for the Form 2 patent and the patent is unenforceable. It accuses Glaxo of 'inequitable conduct' and says it failed to make proper disclosures at the time of filing for the patent.

The charges have been refuted by Glaxo, which said it was confident the case would be decided in its favour. 'Under US patent law it is presumed that a patent granted by the US Patent Office is valid,' it said. 'The onus therefore lies on Novopharm to demonstrate otherwise to the court by clear and convincing evidence.'

The company said that patent authorities in 60 countries had granted it a patent on Form 2 and no patent had been successfully challenged.

At stake is the world's best selling drug. Discovered by the company in 1976, Zantac's worldwide sales amounted to pounds 1.8bn last year, of which the US accounted for dollars 1.6bn.

Last week Novopharm, together with Barr Laboratories, lost a legal action against Wellcome, the British group which makes AZT, the Aids drug. The case was thrown out by the North Carolina court which ruled that there was 'overwhelming and conclusive evidence' that Wellcome had been first to think of using AZT for the treatment of Aids.

British Biotechnology announced the start of the first trial of its Aids treatment, p24-VLP. The drug is to be tested on 300 patients with advanced HIV infection. Dosing has already begun in Britain and Australia.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in