Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Upgrade for Allied bowls

Friday 16 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Allied Leisure has put in place a big investment programme for its chain of ten-pin bowling centres following its move into first place at the end of the last year through the acquisition of the GX Superbowl ten-pin business from Granada.

The company, which announced results for the six months to December yesterday, said "significant funds" had been earmarked for development of the enlarged estate in the second half. Results from two pilot sites had shown like- for-like sales increases of more than 20 per cent.

Ken Scobie, chairman, said: "During the second-half of the year Allied will start to see both the benefits of its investment in upgrading its core estate and initial benefits from the GX acquisition."

The investment was necessary, said Allied, because competition continued to intensify in the leisure industry. Non-bowling activities contribute more than half group sales.

Allied said, because it had changed its year end from mid-June to the end of the month, the profits for 1994/5 were not comparable with the latest figures. The company said it hoped to return to the dividend list at the year end.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in