Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

University sues Glaxo over Epivir

John Willcock
Wednesday 24 July 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Glaxo Wellcome says it would vigorously fight a patent infringement suit brought against the company yesterday by Atlanta's Emory University over a new Aids treatment called 3TC.

The university's suit seeks damages on the sale and distribution of 3TC, which Glaxo licenses from BioChem Pharma and sells as Epivir in the US. BioChem Pharma is a Canadian research company and is also being sued by Emory.

Glaxo's shares finished the day in London down 27.5p to 884p, having dropped 31.5p in mid-afternoon.

Emory said yesterday that the US Patent and Trademark Office had granted the Georgia-based university a patent on 3TC. It said its scientists had discovered the process by which 3TC is made. It acknowledged, however, that BioChem Pharma discovered the compound from which the drug is derived.

Glaxo refused to say whether it would be prepared to settle with Emory. Analysts said that even if the drugs companies lose the suit, it probably wouldn't hit profits or sales badly.

Typically in such cases "process" patent holders can get 1 to 2 per cent of sales, although it is unclear whether any such settlement would come from Glaxo Wellcome or BioChem Pharma. It is understood that Glaxo already pays a royalty on the drug to BioChem of 14 per cent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in