Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ultimate task may prove too much for BMW

Wednesday 09 October 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Strange things happen to the profits of British companies when they are piped through the German accounting system. Just ask Rover which, to its bemusement, saw a pounds 92m operating profit turn into a pounds 148m loss last year.

Well here's another set of whacky figures to get your mind around from the same folk who brought you Rover's disappearing profits act. BMW, which paid pounds 800m for Rover in an uncharacteristic display of largess two years ago, wants to increase production at its British subsidiary from 500,000 to 750,000 over the next four years without taking on a single extra fitter. As if that wasn't enough, it also wants to build a plant in the West Midlands that will churn out 400,000 engines a year for the car that will replace the Rover 600 and 800 series.

Even supposing that some staff are transferred from building engines to the more labour-intensive business of bolting together cars, that still suggests a productivity leap of 40-50 per cent. Er, not quite, says Dr Walter Hasselkus, who has just cruised over from Berlin on his BMW1000 motorcycle to take charge at Longbridge. The figure he has in mind for efficiency savings is more like 4 per cent a year. That, according to BMW, would still be world-class but it is a far cry from the improvements implied by its ambitious production targets.

The discrepancy can be explained by the mountain of cash that BMW intends to throw at the old dog to get Rover where it wants it to be in the next decade. The Germans plan to spend a cool pounds 3bn on Rover before they see a single penny in profit back.

The ultimate driving machine has taken on the ultimate task. It plans to replace the entire product line-up and cut the number of basic platforms that Rover and Land Rover use from 11 to seven while overhauling quality standards so that the doors close with a chunk not a clink.

If BMW is ever to make decent profits on such colossal investment it can only mean one thing - that the price of a Rover will start to march smartly upwards. If you think the current Mini is expensive at a shade under pounds 9,000 just wait until you see the new version for the next millennium. The one thing that Rover's customers are not used to is paying top prices for their cars. Convincing them otherwise will be almost as hard a task as knocking Longbridge and Cowley into shape. Certainly it is going to take all BMW's legendary marketing skills.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in