UKTV to challenge Channel 5 decision
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MATHEW HORSMAN
Media Editor
UKTV, the failed high bidder for Channel 5, was yesterday considering a fresh challenge to the controversial licence award, informed sources said.
It is believed the consortium, backed by the Canadian broadcaster CanWest, has reviewed documents and affadavits submitted to the High Court in advance of a separate challenge on the Channel 5 award mounted by Virgin TV, another failed bidder.
UKTV is to decide, after consultation with lawyers, whether the information might be used to mount new legal action. An attempt late last year to win leave for judicial review was denied by the High Court.
The fresh information is believed to centre on two issues: programming quality; and procedural unfairness. Virgin TV won its right to judicial review primarily on the issue of unfairness, and its case will be heard on 17 January. Both UKTV and New Century, a third failed bidder, have access to the documents and affadavits presented to the High Court.
These are believed to include copies of correspondence between the winning bidder, Channel 5 Broadcasting, and the Independent Television Commission, which show that the winning bidder was given two chances to clarify its funding arrangements.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments