Thorn shares hit by US court ruling
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Shares in Thorn, hit their lowest yet yesterday, plunging 9 per cent to close at 151.5p, after the company said a New Jersey court ruling could force it to pay $120m (pounds 75m) in damages for overcharging customers at its Rent-A-Center stores.
The company, which has given investors a rough ride since it split from EMI last August, admitted yesterday that it was considering making a provision to cover the costs. Thorn announced only four months ago that it had been forced to make a pounds 17m provision against possible damages relating to a similar case in Minnesota.
City analysts expressed concern yesterday that other suits could incur substantial costs. Claims in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Texas are still outstanding, and observers said there were worries that customers in other states would follow suit.
One analyst said: "It's very difficult to know when the next spot on the horizon will appear. Some other states may decide to join the bandwagon."
Thorn said it would appeal against the court's judgment, which ruled that the Rent-A-Center stores owed customers - many of whom are on a low income - fees and interest paid for home furnishings. The judgment said customers were entitled to recover 40 per cent of what they had paid, but under New Jersey law Thorn could be liable for three times that figure.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments