Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Pru set for Treasury clash

John Murray
Tuesday 14 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Prudential, Britain's biggest insurer, is on a collision course with the Treasury over the Stock Exchange inquiry into share dealings by the company's former chief executive, Mick Newmarch.

The Pru disputes the account of a meeting last October between Mr Newmarch and Kenneth Clarke, Chancellor of the Exchequer. Mr Clarke and Mr Newmarch discussed the report by the Securities and Investments Board into pension transfers that is at the centre of the imbroglio surrounding Mr Newmarch's share dealings and his subsequent resignation.

Mr Newmarch exercised and sold more than 200,000 share options, making a profit of more than £200,000, on the day the SIB report was published.

In a preliminary finding last Wednesday the Stock Exchange found the company, Mr Newmarch and Prudential's chairman, Sir Brian Corby, in breach of its model code governing share dealings by directors.

The company is continuing to defend vigorously its behaviour. It maintains that the details of the SIB report were widely known before publication and did not constitute price-sensitive information.

As part of its argument, it disputes the Treasury version of the meeting between Mr Clarke and Mr Newmarch. It is understood that David Prosser, chief executive of Legal & General, who was also present at the meeting, has written to the Stock Exchange backing Mr Newmarch's version of events.

Senior Treasury officials are due to give evidence tomorrow to a Stock Exchange committee hearing Prudential's initial appeal against censure. Insiders at the Pru still believe the company, Mr Newmarch and Sir Brian, who authorised the share deal, will be exonerated finally.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in