The one-minute expert
Your essential companion to this week's big event : ICI
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Imperial Chemical Industries, right?
Heavens, no. Former chairman Sir Denys Henderson insisted it stood for Innovative, Competitive, International.
The same Sir Denys who almost lost ICI to Hanson?
Yup - though there was never a formal bid.
The same Sir Denys who had to split ICI into two to get the share price up?
Yup again, though this was of course a strategic move. Nothing to do with Hanson. Sir Denys said so.
He said it stood for Innovative, Competitive, International?
Well it's better than Internet Central Indiana. Just.
Why is it in the news?
Its third-quarter results are out this week. The market believes they won't make pretty reading.
Why not?
The PET market has gone sour, for one thing.
They sell animals?
No, it's a polymer used to make soft drinks bottles. There's too much of it about and its price has fallen by a quarter this year. ICI warned about that in June; the brokers say it will only make pounds 820m this year, against pounds 950m last time.
ICI was once a great world force, wasn't it?
It was formed in 1926 to divvy up the chemicals world with Du Pont of the US and Germany's IG Farben. No boring monopoly laws then.
So what happened?
ICI got the British Empire, which was a bum deal. IG Farben got broken up after supplying Zyklon B gas to the Nazis but its three successor companies are now each bigger than ICI. And Dupont invented nylons. ICI managers compared themselves with "the senior civil service" even in the Sixties, so it's not surprising things didn't get better.
But didn't thingy with the lurid ties rescue it?
Sir John Harvey-Jones did some good work. He and everyone since have been obsessed with getting into high-margin products, rather than riding the economic cycles like the Germans.
High margins, like pharmaceuticals?
Exactly - except ICI doesn't make them any more. The company that split from it, Zeneca, does instead.
So what does it actually make?
Oh, chemicals, paints, fertilisers and explosives. And PET.
But aren't those cyclical businesses?
Er, yes.
So is it innovative, etc?
Not particularly - but the current chairman, Sir Ronnie Hampel, is an extremely nice chap.
That's all right then.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments