The Investment column: Merant
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MERANT, the computer company formed from the merger of Micro Focus and Intersolv, is a rare beast. Despite being involved in the Internet and expecting profits this year, the company trades on just 13 times forecast earnings.
Merant is perceived as a millennium bug company whose business is on the verge of oblivion. It has specialised in vetting computers which use the now-superceded Cobol language. Among its clients are 96 of the US's Fortune 100 companies. But Merant's rating misses the point that these companies, having invested heavily in checking their systems are compliant, will retain Cobol-based systems after the millennium. That's an opportunity for Merant to supply services to those wanting to update Cobol systems for e-commerce. And because everyone thought Cobol was heading for oblivion, Merant has few rivals.
Yesterday's results, showing revenues of $374.2m (pounds 233m) down from $379m a year earlier, show the merged group is holding its own. Analysts expect pre-tax profits of pounds 31.3m this year and earnings of 12.7p, rising to pounds 50.7m and 20.0p per share in 2001. The shares are too cheap.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments