Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Investment Column: Cider makers feel squeezed

Edited Sameena Ahmad
Thursday 11 December 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The cider industry is in turmoil. Growing competition from the new crop of creamy, smooth beers and alcopops have caused sales to slump. A rise in duty on strong ciders has forced manufacturers to raise prices, causing customers to switch to other tipples in droves.

All three quoted cider makers, Matthew Clark, Merrydown and HP Bulmer, have seen their shares collapse since the start of the year.

Bulmer added to the gloom yesterday by announcing a 17.5 per cent fall in pre-tax profits to pounds 14.3m in the six months to October. Its shares fell another 15p to 392.5p. A pounds 2.5m increase in the advertising budget for brands such as Strongbow failed to curb the slump in the market. Bulmer predicted the market would rise by 4 per cent in the year to September. In fact it has fallen 7 per cent. Despite Bulmer's assertions that the market has bottomed, the fall in sales that Matthew Clark has experienced in the vital run-up to Christmas suggests that the industry's troubles are far from over.

Bulmer and Matthew Clark are gambling that a further rise in advertising spend will eventually pay off. In the long run, it is hard to argue with the strategy. After all, a dearth of this kind of spending contributed the industry's problems in the first place.

But the investment may not bear fruit for years and most investors won't want to hang around to find out.

One obvious answer to the cider makers' woes is to join forces. Merrydown is already in the bid spotlight and Matthew Clark and Bulmer should consider a merger, which would allow them to pool their advertising efforts. Given that a tie-up would give the two more than 90 per cent of the UK cider market, this obviously raises monopoly issues. But these are not insurmountable as they could argue cider is in effect competing with the broader beer and lager market.

Analysts have cut Bulmer's full-year profit forecasts by pounds 1m to pounds 27m, putting the shares on 12 times forward earnings. Until there are signs of a recovery in the cider market, its shares, which have fallen from 625p in March, still look high enough.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in