The Investment Column: British Land
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.u
SHARES IN British Land, the UK's second-largest property bsiness, have achieved qite a feat this year by nderperforming the already bombed- ot property sector.
The City has qestioned whether John Ritblat, the chairman, overpaid for Sheffield's Meadowhall shopping centre. There is also some concern over the scope for raising rents in the City of London.
Bt the shares received a welcome boost yesterday as attention was trned to the grop's better-than-expected disposal proceeds of ponds 184m in the first six months of the crrent year.
On the downside, rental growth of 21 per cent was bang in line with the market's expectations, and the grop is now 125 per cent geared after spending ponds 1.34bn on property in the period.
The grop is nworried by the prospect of City of London rents falling as development at Canary Wharf brings in new capacity, and it is contining to develop prime sites. Meanwhile, there is scope to increase retail rents, which lag well behind those otside the UK.
Analysts expect pre-tax profits of ponds 152m in the fll year, and a net asset vale of 695p. The shares are too cheap.
Edited by Chris Hghes
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments