Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Investment Column: British Biotech

Wednesday 30 June 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITISH BIOTECH says it has put its scandalous past behind it. It has agreed settlements with both the US Securities and Exchange Commission and with whistleblower Andy Millar, who raised questions about the effectiveness of the biotechnology group's drugs. Last week the London Stock Exchange completed its investigation into breaches of its rules. The total cost of the affair in litigation and payments to departed directors was pounds 4.2m.

But while the slate may be clean, the effect of the negative sentiment generated by Millargate makes the company particularly hard to value. The shares closed at 21.5p yesterday, up from a recent low of 15p.

Curiously enough, dividing the group's pounds 97.8m of cash among its 661m shares gives a value of, er, 15p per share. Valuing the group's three drugs in development, however much they are worth per share, is counterbalanced by the negative effect of damaged confidence. Of British Biotech's three drugs, only Marimastat - one of the drugs at the heart of last year's scandal - is far enough through trials to form a base for any estimate of the company's potential. It is a cancer drug, which has had little success in trials to date. Two years ago, the group made bold claims for Marimastat. Unlike many cancer drugs, which only reduce tumour size, it aimed to reduce mortality. If test results show Marimastat has such potential, it could resurrect the company.

Meanwhile, instead of promising miracle remedies at its results meeting yesterday, the company broadcast its plan to diversify the development portfolio to balance the high risks of projects such as Marimastat. What British Biotech needs is the support of a reputable pharmaceutical partner. The group warns this could take months.

Several companies have done due diligence in the past year but no deal has come. The group declined to indicate if it had received bid approaches following the recent merger of Celltech and Chiroscience. If it spends pounds 25m a year, British Biotech has four years to find a partner before it gets desperate. Even so, more bad news about Marimastat could pummel the shares, which are best avoided.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in