Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'I've read over 40,000 résumés, and this is the biggest mistake job seekers make'

Jacquelyn Smith
Thursday 19 May 2016 16:17 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When Tina Nicolai began working as a recruiter for Walt Disney World in the late 1990s, she noticed that many job seekers were submitting flawed résumés.

"I realised people simply did not know how to market themselves or their achievements," Nicolai tells Business Insider. "And that's how I knew there was a market to educate job candidates at all levels and in all industries."

In 2010 she founded Résumé Writers' Ink.

"Since launching my company, I've read over 40,000 résumés," she says. "And this is the biggest mistake job seekers make: They are sloppy. They pay poor attention to detail. They are lazy!"

Nicolai says she has seen too many résumés with typos, unprofessional fonts, outdated information, and irrelevant information.

"Another 'lazy' thing I see on résumés is when people start a bullet point with 'Responsible for,'" she says.

"Candidates need to under

stand that starting a sentence with 'responsible for' tells the reader what the job requirements were supposed to be, but it does not state that the candidate actually performed the functions," Nicolai says. "It does not state that the candidate was successful in these functions. Don't be lazy: Take the extra few minutes to explain what you accomplished -- not what you were expected to accomplish."#

Read more:

• 13 useful life hacks you can learn in a minute
• Why Microsoft's chatbot turned into a racist
• Everyone is worried that the China bubble will pop

Read the original article on Business Insider UK. © 2016. Follow Business Insider UK on Twitter.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in