Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The best and the worst: Insurance Funds - UK Equities

Nic Cicutti
Sunday 13 February 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

OVER the past five years, some of the top-performing UK equity insurance funds grew by 100 per cent or more, while investors in a number of others will have lost money.

The top performer over five years, the Beehive Standard fund of the Tunbridge Wells Equitable friendly society, is closed.

Hill Samuel's financial trust, which came second, has been one of the top 10 trusts every year for the past seven.

Leigh Harrison, the fund's manager, said that since taking over in 1988 he has pursued an aggressive but also highly active strategy. This has meant, for example, dropping some smaller companies when they were on their way down in the late 1980s, and taking advantage of their growth from 1991 onwards.

A common feature of the top and the worst-performing funds is their relatively small size - no more than pounds 10m or so. This has the benefit of producing large gains if the investment choices are good. However, should just one or two mistakes be made, investors end up paying the consequences for several years.

Gregor Logan, head of investments at MGM, whose Special Situations fund was in bottom position, said: 'The position is that, up to October 1987, the fund had performed very well. My predecessor was very keen on smaller companies and the fund was very aggressive. After the crash, a decision had to be made whether to stay with smaller companies or spread the risk. They made the wrong decision and stayed with smaller companies.

'The recession lasted longer and was deeper than expected, which meant that performance was tainted for several years.'

----------------------------------------------------------------- Table: INSURANCE FUNDS: UK EQUITIES ----------------------------------------------------------------- The best % 1 Tunbridge Wells Beehive 130.0 2 Hill Samuel Financial 126.2 3 Liberty Blue Chip 118.5 4 Tunbridge Wells Prize Plan Tax 110.9 5 Equitable Fund of Investment Trusts 108.3 The worst 170 Continental Equity -7.5 171 City of Westminster Equity -7.8 172 Windsor UK Equity -14.0 173 Century Life Smaller Companies -19.1 174 MGM Special Situations -42.0 The chart shows fund performance over five years to January 31, 1994. Offer to offer; net income reinvested. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Source: Hindsight by Hardwick Stafford Wright. -----------------------------------------------------------------

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in