Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Swift plans to hand rail routes to rivals

Randeep Ramesh,Transport Correspondent
Tuesday 31 March 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

FAILING rail companies could be relieved of running services in certain areas under radical plans put forward by the rail regulator yesterday. John Swift QC, the industry regulator, watered down proposals for even greater competition and head-on battles between rail companies and instead plumped for tightening his grip on the rail network.

Next year's winter timetable will allow train companies to apply to run a rival's services - if Mr Swift considers they are failing to meet adequately their customers' demands.

The new policy will allow up to 20 per cent of a train operator's revenue to be up for grabs by rival companies in 1999. More competition could follow if Mr Swift's plans are a success - with a review of the system pencilled in for 2002.

Mr Swift did not give a definition of a "failing service" but the regulator has considerable control over track access charges and timetabling. Mr Swift said the policy would place "additional incentives" on train companies to "achieve and maintain greater benefits for passengers through improved services or lower fares".

At present, train operators enjoy complete protection withintheir franchise area under track access agreements with Railtrack.

There should be little new cost to the taxpayer, according to Mr Swift. "I expect this policy to lead to the introduction of new services such as airport links, services to new developments, to shopping and leisure centres, and park and ride sites, and cross-regional services."

Some train companies have privately voiced their concerns. Connex - which runs two large franchises in the South-east - has made it clear it would prefer no competition. Last year Connex South Central dropped 300 trains from its timetable - at the time many experts said another company should have stepped in to run the service.

Some companies have already launched competing services. The route between London and Peterborough is served by both GNER and WAGN, which last year bought out a "dedicated" annual season ticket for pounds 1,000 less than GNER's.

Outlook, page 21

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in