Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Staple's unstable future

Patrick Hosking
Saturday 24 June 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Staple's unstable future

I BEGAN to wonder about George Staple's judgement when he recently declared that the amount of monitoring of financial businesses these days made it "almost impossible" to commit fraud. Bizarre, from the head of the Serious Fraud Office. He insists he was quoted out of context and I was happy to give him the benefit of the doubt. But anyone following his progress with the Treasury Select Committee over the last fortnight would have fresh reason to wonder.

Last week he apologised to the committee after misleading it over its inquiries into the SFO's handling of the case of Roger Levitt. The case, you'll recall, provoked a national outcry when the fraudster escaped being sent to prison and was sentenced to 180 hours of community service. The committee is investigating allegations that Staple authorised a plea bargain for Levitt which made it most unlikely he would be jailed.

Staple was warned ahead of his appearance that he would be questioned over the Levitt case. Yet he appeared vague, bumbling and under-briefed - to the extent of failing to recall a key meeting with the prosecution QC. He was like a schoolboy summoned to the headmaster to explain his absence from assembly who isn't ready with any kind of explanation.

The SFO's reputation remains at rock-bottom. This is despite the occasional coup - on Friday it saw the Merseyside businessman Neil Bradshaw jailed for six years on charges of theft relating to Consolidated Sterling Deposits.

The Levitt saga is far from over. The select committee is now taking evidence from the lawyers in the case, many of whom are hostile to the SFO. Staple faces a further grilling next month. Meanwhile one MP on the committee has tabled 16 probing questions on the case to the Attorney General. It promises to be a hairy summer for Staple.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in