Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

SmithKline merger on track as lawyers plan to ring-fence AHP liabilitie s

Andrew Yates
Monday 26 January 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SmithKline Beecham's pounds 75bn merger with American Home Products, appears to be on track, with lawyers close to overcoming one of the main obstacles to what promises to be biggest corporate deal in history.

If the merger does go ahead it is likely spark a radical shake-up of both groups which could involve a multi-billion pound disposal programme.

SmithKline and AHP's lawyers are working on a plan to ring-fence potential legal liabilities arising from problems with some of the US group's products.

One option is to follow the example of T&N, once the largest asbestos manufacturer in the UK, which capped liabilities by taking out an insurance policy. Another plan under consideration is setting up a separate company which would be liable to pay any claims. The newly merged group would then be freed of any future liabilities.

Despite the legal complexities, the two sides are confident that they can reach a solution. "They would not have gone ahead with the merger talks and gone public if they thought that the potential problems were insurmountable," said one source.

AHP has recently been forced to withdraw from sale two leading dieting drugs, Redux and Pondimim, which were commonly used in the now discredited diet cocktail known as Fen-Phen. Research demonstrated that they could cause potentially fatal complications. It also faces legal action over Norplant, a contraceptive device that is alleged to have negative side- effects, including personality changes. Analysts estimate that legal claims could rise to several billions of dollars.

If a merger does go through AHP's agrochemical arm, which includes herbicides, pesticides and fertiliser businesses, is likely to be sold off soon after the deal is completed, according to sources close to the talks. The business does not sit easily with the huge prescription drugs and healthcare business that SmithKline and AHP seek to create.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in