Simpson's rebels still defy Baldwin
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.REBEL shareholders of Simpson's of Cornhill, owner of the famous City chop house, are continuing to resist the takeover by Baldwin, and could force the holidays, printing and properties group into a technical argument with the Stock Exchange.
Because the rebels speak for more than 10 per cent of Simpson's shares, Baldwin is unable to acquire minority stakes compulsorily. The compulsory purchase trigger comes into play once bid acceptances reach 90 per cent.
That could pose a problem for Baldwin in having Simpson's quotation removed from the exchange. Simpson's shares are traded on the Unlisted Securities Market.
Robert Klapp, owner of 7 per cent of Simpson's, said he would continue to reject the offer, which was yesterday declared unconditional with the vast majority of shareholders having accepted.
Mountjoy, an investment company based in Hong Kong and owner of a 7 per cent stake, is also believed to be standing firm. Mr Klapp said: 'Mountjoy phoned me on Thursday to say they are not accepting.'
He called the all-share terms, valuing Simpson's at pounds 1.7m, 'an insult'. Baldwin should have made a cash offer, he said.
The rules governing delisting are complicated, although Sandy Singh, chief executive of Baldwin, believes he can negotiate the technical hurdles.
For a full listing, more than 25 per cent of a company's shares must be in public hands. For the USM it is 10 per cent. The basis of argument for Baldwin will probably revolve around the rule that says a shareholder holding more than 5 per cent is non-public.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments