Shell adopts tougher management style
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE STRUGGLE to sharpen the image of the Anglo-Dutch oil group Royal Dutch/Shell continued yesterday with the announcement that it is to be run by a series of chief executives and executive committees.
Mark Moody Stuart, chairman of the company's committee of managing directors, told the group's global leadership conference in London that the changes were a response to the need to make decisions rapidly and to have clear accountability. "We will still have discussions, but we will make business decisions rapidly," he said.
In an effort to maintain the delicate balance of power between the British and Dutch arms, Shell has long been known for its consensual approach to decision-making. This is felt to have served it well, but investors and analysts have grown concerned that it is too bureaucratic and cumbersome for the current business outlook.
Already the subject of criticism for its poor financial performance compared with Exxon and BP, Shell feels the pressure of those companies' planned mergers with Mobil and Amoco respectively and the sharp fall in oil prices.
The changes - whereby each division will be controlled by a small team of senior executives - stem from an overhaul of the organisational structure put in place by Mr Moody Stuart's predecessor, Cor Herkstroter. A spur to the shake-up came from two events in 1995 - the furore over the planned sinking of the Brent Spar oil platform and human rights activists' criticism of the company's role in Nigeria.
These events were seen as demonstrating how far removed the management had become from the real world and how difficult it found responding to crises.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments