Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

SFA's Barings cases face collapse

Richard Phillips
Sunday 17 November 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

At least two of the final three cases being brought by the Securities and Futures Association against former Barings' staff face collapse following the successful appeal by former director Ron Baker last week.

In a humiliation for the City watchdog, Mr Baker, the bank's former head of financial products, was cleared on four of five charges by the SFA's own appeals tribunal and kept his licence to practise in the industry.

The SFA has three more tribunal hearings pencilled in for appeals against proposed fines and disqualifications.

They include Mary Walz, a former Barings director, who was global head of equity financial products and worked directly to Mr Baker.

The charges brought against Ms Walz are similar to the ones against Mr Baker, for which in all he received just a reprimand, the lowest form of sanction.

"The SFA must be reconsidering its position on her case, given that she was in a subordinate position and her charges are similar," a source said.

A tribunal set for January against Ian Hopkins, Barings' former head of group treasury and risk, may prove the SFA's sternest test yet.

Mr Hopkins has threatened not to appear, claiming that charges against him over the pounds 800m crash last year are groundless.

He has already made his concerns about the SFA public and has given evidence to the Treasury & Civil Service Select Committee. In front of MPs, he claimed the status of a whistle-blower, having alerted senior Barings management to some of the dubious events in Singapore under rogue trader Nick Leeson.

James Bax, who oversaw the Singapore operations, is also appealing. The tribunals are due to be completed by the end of February.

Tomorrow is the last day the Select Committee will take evidence on the debacle, with Bank of England Governor Eddie George set for a grilling.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in