Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Search on for new Tiphook chief

John Murray,David Hellier
Saturday 09 October 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TWO non-executive directors of Tiphook, the troubled transport leasing company, have begun a search for a new chief executive to replace Robert Montague, who is also chairman, according to sources close to the company.

Martin Kohlhaussen, chairman of Commerzbank, and Sir Charles Powell, Lady Thatcher's former foreign affairs adviser, are increasingly concerned for the future of the group. Neither was available for comment, but they are said to be looking inside and outside Tiphook for a chief executive who will at least complement Mr Montague, if he hangs on as chairman.

Mr Montague is believed to have the continuing support of Rupert Hambro, the deputy chairman, and Eric Goodwin, an executive director.

Mr Montague is one of the highest-paid executives in Britain, with a salary last year of pounds 851,000. His position at Tiphook has become increasingly precarious as the company - which has a gearing of more than 400 per cent and is badly hit by recession - runs into deeper financial trouble. It is already in talks with its bankers.

A company source said: 'Some of the non-executives are unhappy with the situation and have been for a while. The resignation of Roger Braidwood (the group's former finance director) was a sacrifice made to appease various interests, but I cannot believe that it has solved anything.'

Tiphook's new public relations adviser confirmed that the possibility of splitting Mr Montague's roles had been on the agenda for a while and that the past week's events might hasten the process. However, one source argued: 'Mr Montague is an all-or-nothing person. He will either hold on to both jobs or leave the group altogether.'

Tiphook's advisers are trying desperately to reassure a sceptical stock market that the company will reach a deal with its bankers after last Thursday's profits warning.

In New York on Friday afternoon, some of the group's pounds 400m of dollar-denominated bonds fell 25 cents in brisk trading to 75 cents as investors complained of a lack of communication from the company.

Tiphook's bankers, led by Commerzbank, Lloyds and NatWest, have a problem on their hands. It is difficult to see how the group can generate enough cash to pay its debts.

The company is still committed to pounds 327m of capital expenditure on new trailers over the next five years, leaving it deeply cash-negative. Abandoning that would lose it the low tax rate it secures from capital allowances.

The dividend, which cost pounds 21.2m this year, must be in doubt, though the high yield resulting from the generous payout has been one of the few props for the company's tottering share price.

There have always been question marks over the value of Tiphook assets, but unloading the fleet of trailers and containers on the market would drive values down further.

The company also has to contend with its bondholders. It has moved a large portion of its debts from bank borrowings into dollar-denominated bonds over the past 12 months. That raises the spectre of legal action from litigious US bondholders.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in