Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Seafield qualifies statement

Diane Coyle
Wednesday 01 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

SEAFIELD, the transport and distribution group, yesterday updated a trading statement it issued last Friday.

The company said last week it had made an unaudited operating profit of pounds 348,000 in the first quarter. The new statement, also put out through the Stock Exchange, said first-quarter operating profits had been pounds 402,000 in 1993, 16 per cent higher than this year's.

Seafield said the earlier figure included a big food distribution contract that ended in July 1993. Excluding this, last year's first- quarter profits were pounds 280,000. Brian Chilver, chairman, said: 'The rise of 24 per cent in profit in the ongoing business is an indication of the progress being made.'

The company said the reason for putting out an additional statement was that meetings with institutional shareholders had begun this week, and there was an interest in comparing this year and last.

The Seafield board faces a challenge from rebel shareholders, who hope to replace Mr Chilver at an extraordinary meeting to be held on 10 June. Both sides in the row are presenting their case to other shareholders.

A spokesman for John East, the stockbroker acting for the dissident shareholders, said: 'When we saw the first announcement we were pleased to see things were going well, but it was the first time they had ever issued a quarterly statement. We got on to the Stock Exchange to say, should there not be a comparative statement?'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in