Savings industry criticises latest appointment to the FSA
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Howard Davies, the chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), has appointed the man behind the decision to launch the mammoth review of mis-sold pensions to be one of the main advisers to the super- regulator's new board. The decision is likely to aggravate a savings industry already smarting about the board's lack of industry representatives.
Michael Blair, the key policy former who led the decision to launch the pension mis-selling review in 1994, was yesterday appointed as the top adviser to the board of directors of the FSA.
The decision to appoint Mr Blair, currently deputy chief executive of the Securities and Investment Board (SIB), drew immediate criticism from a savings industry which privately believes the mis-selling review was the product of a great miscalculation by the regulators.
Industry practitioners said that while Mr Blair was respected as a regulator, his appointment would further alienate practitioners from a new regulator which now had very little top-level input from the industry.
Geoffrey Pointon, a former board member of financial advice regulator Fimbra, said: "Mr Davies has got a major challenge on his hands to show that he is in touch with the industry. Many feel that the review has blighted the industry for too long and now, with politicians getting involved, it is going to continue."
While leading industry figures have accepted the pension review as a necessary evil, many believe that SIB, the FSA's predecessor, failed to calculate the effort required to complete it.
The deadline for completing the review of 90 per cent of the most urgent cases of mis-selling was set in 1994 for 1 January 1996. But during 1995 and 1996 the review became mired in legal disputes and even the most urgent phase is more than two years behind schedule.
The FSA yesterday said preference for the new posts had been given to insiders at the old regulators, although external advisers had been appointed to monitor the recruitment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments