Sandline lost out in Sierra Leone
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SANDLINE International, the mercenary company which was investigated by a parliamentary commission, a select committee and the world's media over its involvement in the war in Sierra Leone, has now admitted the ultimate ignominy - it actually lost money on the deal, writes Jason Nisse.
Sandline was eventually cleared of doing anything illegal, but it has now emerged that its Sierra Leone contract was a loss-maker.
In an exclusive interview with The Independent on Sunday, Tim Spicer, Sandline's chief, said that the group was due to be paid $10m (pounds 6.2m) by a controversial Canadian businessman, Rakesh Saxena, who had a side deal with President Kabbah to exploit mineral rights in the African nation.
Unfortunately for Sandline, Mr Saxena ran into difficulties with the Thai government, which accused him of fraud. He was arrested early last year in possession of a fake Serbian passport. At that point he had paid only $1.5m and has not paid any more since.
Mr Spicer, a former Lieutenant-Colonel in the British army, said that the entire $1.5m was spent on hiring mercenary soldiers and equipping them in the Sierra Leone conflict. "We did not make a profit, and once we had gone through the saga with Customs it cost us quite a lot of money."
CASH FOR COMBAT, PAGE 3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments