Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Saatchi to seek injunction against four

John Shepherd
Monday 06 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Saatchi & Saatchi will attempt to obtain restraining injunctions on Maurice Saatchi, its former chairman and one of the advertising agency's founding fathers, and three other former employees at the High Court in London on Wednesday.

The hearing, which will be in open court, will probably last two days and could well spill over into Friday, a company spokesman said yesterday.

The other three former employees that Saatchi & Saatchi is attempting to stop from starting a competing business with Maurice Saatchi are Jeremy Sinclair, Bill Muirhead and David Kershaw, who resigned on 9 January over the ousting in December of the chairman.

Mr Sinclair was the £350,000-a-year acting chairman for only three weeks and the chief creative director; Mr Muirhead was the head of the North American operations; and Mr Kershaw was in charge of the British business.

Besides the attempt to obtain injunctions, the company is also involved in legal action against the four men on several other fronts.

The company is claiming damages against them for an alleged "conspiracy to injure the business of the group and against Maurice Saatchi for soliciting the other three". In return, Maurice Saatchi has issued a writ against the company for unspecified damages for alleged breach of contract.

The company is also in the throes of taking legal action against Mr Muirhead on the other side of the Atlantic, where it has filed a lawsuit in New York claiming damages of $50m. Mr Muirhead is trying to have the action thrown out of court.

Other matters are also being investigated by the company's solicitors, Macfarlanes.

One main area is a reputed $40m (£25m) settlement that Maurice Saatchi and his brother Charles, who is still honorary president of the company, made as a result of a legal dispute with Adidas, the German sports firm.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in