Saatchi & Saatchi accused of `outrageous' slur
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lawyers acting for Bill Muirhead, the former chairman of the North American division of Saatchi & Saatchi, yesterday told a New York State judge that the agency was trying to defame their client in a lawsuit against him for $50m (£32m).
The advertising firm, still trying to regroup following its bitter separation earlier this month from one of its founders, Maurice Saatchi, has accused Mr Muirhead of breach of contract after his decision also to leave the agency.
The US lawsuit is being brought against Mr Muirhead in parallel with legal actions already being pursued in Britain. The US action includes a claim that Mr Muirhead - who later agreed to join Mr Saatchi in creating a rival agency - stole Saatchi files from his Manhattan office.
Mr Muirhead's lawyers asked the judge to dismiss the suit on the grounds of insufficient evidence and unnecessary duplication with actions in the UK.
Judge Herman Cahn deferred a decision on the request for several days. Mr Muirhead's lawyers expressed confidence that the case would either be dismissed or severely limited in its scope. "He made it clear that he is not going to let the other side convert this into a free-ranging litigation," said Les Fagen, one of the legal team.
Mr Muirhead, who was in Britain yesterday, is said to be enraged over the US lawsuit and in particular over the suggestion that he is a thief.
Mr Fagen said: "What is so offensive is that they [Saatchi] chose to obtain a tactical advantage really by defaming Mr Muirhead with these outrageous accusations."
Mr Fagen said he believed the Saatchi case to be based on the word of a lift-service representative who apparently saw Mr Muirhead leaving his former Manhattan office on a Saturday afternoon early this month with a box of files under his arm.
Sources close to Mr Muirhead have said the box contained only personal files and a bank statement.
The defence also highlighted yesterday that the witness in question happens also to be married to a vice-president of Saatchi & Saatchi North America.
In London, a spokesman for the agency was reported as saying it had additional material to submit to the court. "We have considerably more evidence than just a lift man."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments