Saatchi camps do battle in court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The battle between Saatchi & Saatchi and its former chairman moved to the High Court yesterday as the troubled advertising group began the first of its legal actions against the deposed Maurice Saatchi.
Saatchi & Saatchi is seeking an injunction against its founder and three top executives who quit to set up a rival firm. They are accused of conspiring to damage its business.
Mr Saatchi, Jeremy Sinclair, the former deputy chairman, and the ex-heads of the Saatchi & Saatchi Agency Worldwide, Bill Muirhead and David Kershaw, were not in court.
A Saatchi & Saatchi spokesman said fresh writs were served yesterday seeking to widen the terms of the injunction in a bid to stop the team from poaching staff under any circumstances. Key figures on some big accounts are among staff who have quit in sympathy with Maurice Saatchi. He was fired as chairman in December after a shareholder revolt, and walked out at the start of January after turning down a lesser role.
Saatchi was set up by Maurice and his elder brother Charles a quarter of a century ago, and became the world's biggest advertising firm in the 1980s.
As part of yesterday's hearing, Saatchi & Saatchi accused Mr Saatchi of soliciting his three colleagues for the "New Saatchi Agency" he is setting up. Maurice Saatchi has already replied with a writ of his own, claiming Saatchi broke his contract when itfired him.
Although Mr Saatchi was fired and is therefore entitled to compensation - negotiations on his severance package are under way - Saatchi says the others are still technically employees and bound by clauses in their contracts that stop them from working for rival operations.
"If the judge finds for us we expect a full trial to come to court this year," a Saatchi spokesman said. Saatchi will seek "substantial" damages if that happens, but a court case could drag on for years.
The proceedings continue today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments