R-R faces pounds 10m claim over licence deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ROLLS-ROYCE Motor Cars is facing a pounds 10m claim in the High Court after allegedly reneging on a deal to license the use of its famous trademarks such as the Spirit of Ecstasy on a range of products from perfume to sports goods.
If the action succeeds then one small part of the Rolls-Royce heritage will remain in British hands after the two German carmakers Volkswagen and BMW have settled their battle for control of the company.
The litigation came to light in the circular to shareholders, sent out yesterday by Rolls' parent company, Vickers, urging them to back VW's pounds 430m bid for the luxury car maker.
The British company Classic Licensing, part owned by the group that runs the Trocadero complex in London's West End, was granted a licence by R-RMC in May, 1996 to use all its trademarks, except for the Rolls- Royce name itself, on a range of perfumes. The agreement was subsequently extended.
But following a change of management at R-RMC the licence was withdrawn a year later on the grounds that Classic Licensing had not submitted the products it proposed to market for approval.
A writ was issued in last June but Classic Licensing agreed to stay proceedings pending discussions with R-RMC. Proceedings were reactivated this month after Classic Licensing said it became clear R-RMC had no intention of granting a licence.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments