Royal Life defended over new exams order
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ROYAL INSURANCE, one of Britain's biggest composite insurance companies, has defended a decision by its life insurance subsidiary, Royal Life, to make its entire 1,000-strong sales staff sit new exams to prove their competence, writes Nic Cicutti.
The company said Royal Life's decision had been entirely voluntary and was not the result of pressure from the industry's watchdog, the Life Assurance and Unit Trust Regulatory Organisation.
It rejected suggestions that its move was prompted by criticism of its training by the regulator, which has already forced other life companies to improve standards.
Royal Life insisted that the exams were merely being brought forward from their original planned date later this year.
About half the staff will be tested today, with the remainder facing similar tests next week. Results will be known in two weeks.
Meanwhile, none of the company's sales staff will be taken off the road or prevented from selling any of its products.
Royal Life's decision to make its staff sit new exams follows that of Nationwide Building Society, which last week suspended its 1,300 sales staff from selling to the public until they are retrained.
Barclays Life, a subsidiary of Barclays Bank, was rebuked by its watchdog, the Securities and Investments Board, for training and supervision errors in its 1,100- strong salesforce. In March, Norwich Union sales staff were also required to sit new exams after Lautro stepped in. The company was later fined pounds 300,000.
Kit Jebens, Lautro's chief executive, said yesterday: 'There are other companies which have decided to take action before they are pushed.' Royal Life is not seen as one of the worst offenders.
View from City Road, page 25
(Graph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments