Row over bank head's 'Libyan connections'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A ROW has broken out between the Bank of England and the US Treasury, which is seeking the removal of the chairman of a London bank because of his alleged Libyan connections.
The issue comes to a head tomorrow when Abdulla Saudi steps down as chief executive of the Arab Banking Corporation, the Middle East's largest bank, but with the apparent intention of staying as chairman of its London offshoot, ABC International.
At issue is the interpretation of UN financial sanctions. Washington believes Mr Saudi is or has been a key player in Libyan state enterprises.
The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac) would like him to go from the London job as well but the Bank of England has been resisting. 'If I'm not judged to be fit and proper they (the Bank of England) will ask me to leave and they haven't,' Mr Saudi said.
Mr Saudi's impending resignation was announced in February following a high-level meeting in Washington attended by officials of Ofac, Bahraini financial regulators and ABC board members. Ofac had concluded that under sanctions ABC constitutes a Libyan enterprise.
In order to prevent its assets from being frozen in the US, Ofac insisted that Mr Saudi resign and that the Libyan shareholding in the parent bank - deemed by US authorities to be 32 per cent although bank documents list it as only 25 per cent - be frozen by the Bahraini authorities. This would mean that the Libyan government would have no voting rights or board representation and would receive no dividends.
The governments of Kuwait and Abu Dhabi each hold 25 per cent stakes in the parent bank, with the remainder held by private individuals, some of whom are believed to represent the government of Libya.
While Mr Saudi remains head of the London subsidiary, he could in effect run the bank 'from the bottom up', sources say, although that may prove impractical.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments