Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rise of a late developer who came from behind

Charles Raw
Saturday 16 October 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

BEFORE hisdramatic arrival at Lonrho, Dieter Bock's business career had blossomed late. Only in the last four years, when he was over 50, does he appear to have made a great deal of money and to have gathered a group of investors in his companies - whose identity remains a mystery.

His big breakseems to have come in 1989, when one of his companies, Gouden Akker, recorded a profit of Fl144m ( pounds 46m) after selling some shares.

In 1991, Mr Bock was big enough to decide the future of a large German construction company, Dyckerhoff and Widmann. He bought a 25 per cent stake, intending to take it over, but changed tack and sold to a rival bidder, Walter Bau group - again for a big profit. By the end of that year, it would seem Mr Bock had climbed into the big league, seriously rich with ambitions to match.

Born in 1939, he was the son of an engineer at a film factory in Dessau in whatbecame East Germany. When Mr Bock was 14, the family fled to the West. He studied law and accountancy before setting up his own consultancy, Bilanz und Steuer (Finance and Tax) in 1973. In the succeeding decade and a half, he converted clients into investors in special legal partnerships, investing in property that enabled them to set their share of the start-up losses against their personal taxes.

Mr Bock was based in Frankfurt, but his investments were carried out through a web of companies in Germany, the US, the Netherlands and Britain.

His career as a businessman began with Kaufhaus KaWe, a small and unsuccessful chain of department stores. Gisela Heinemann, the daughter and heir of a Bock client, Erich Heinemann, was part-owner of Kaufhaus. In 1986, the stores' properties were transferred to Mr Bock's property subsidiary, Advanta Management, in anticipation of expansion plans which did not materialise. Throughout his involvement the group has failed to make large profits.

Mr Bock's first big deal came in 1988, when Philipp Holzmann, Germany's largest construction company, said it had acquired a 135,000sq m site in Frankfurt in partnership with a 'lawyer', later revealed to be Mr Bock. The deal proved extremely profitable, although it is difficult to work out which of Mr Bock's companies received the benefit.

After his windfalls in 1989 and 1991, deals became ever larger. In 1992, Mr Bock bought a 50 per cent stake in the Kempinski hotel chain in Eastern Europe for DM300m ( pounds 123m). Then came the pounds 130m Lonrho deal. The source of the money for this remains mysterious. Mr Bock maintains half is his own, the rest borrowed from banks such as Deutsche Bank. He says it is completely separate from his Continental operations so that, if it goes wrong, the rest of his empire will be unaffected. The Lonrho shares are, indeed, owned by a company called Laerstate, which used to be owned by Gouden Akker (one of his Continental vehicles) but which, in December last year, was put into Mr Bock's name.

Mr Bock's first involvement in Britain came in 1990, when Advanta and Holzmann bought stakes in the construction group, Tilbury. But his biggest deal, apart from his pounds 130m stake in Lonrho, was his 50 per cent stake in Kempinski.

Today the relationship between Mr Bock, Holzmann,the various 'Advanta' companies and Gouden Akker remains less clear than it would be under British law, which would have forced him to set out clearly the shareholdings and inter-company relationships involved.

This is a shortened version of an article that first appeared in Eurobusiness.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in