Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Revenue rules PEP funds out of bounds

Nic Cicutti
Saturday 28 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

INVESTORS in personal equity plans that put part of their money in some Far Eastern and other emerging markets could find a tax bill thudding through their letterboxes.

The potential tax headache for investors follows a decision by the Inland Revenue to query the tax-exempt status of some foreign countries.

Tax officials say countries such as Mexico, Thailand, South Korea and Malaysia are not on its list of approved markets for PEP purposes. This means that money invested in those countries through a PEP is not exempt from tax.

Only funds invested in the tax year to April 1994 are involved, following the Revenue's decision to tighten up the rules. Up to 20 funds are thought to be affected. Under PEP rules, at least 50 per cent of a pounds 6,000 annual investment must be in UK or European stocks.

Up to pounds 1,500 may be invested in funds elsewhere, but at least half of that must be in shares from stock exchanges listed by the Inland Revenue. This includes Colombo, Sri Lanka; and Athens, Greece, but not South Korea or Mexico.

The confusion stems from the fact that until recently some fund managers believed the relevant list of stock exchanges was a different one, issued by their own watchdog, the Securities and Investments Board.

Talks to resolve the difficulty have taken place between the Inland Revenue and officers from the Association of Investment Trust Companies, representing the PEP industry.

Nick Wells, a product development manager at Barings, said: 'We hope it will be possible to solve the problem. I understand that it was a simple misunderstanding and there is no reason why those stock exchanges should not be listed. We have a very small number whose PEPs are part-invested in our Korea fund.' He added that it was possible that if the decision went against investors, many fund managers would be likely to refund any tax losses.

A unit trust that invests in emerging markets across the world by putting money into existing investment trusts has been launched.

This fund of funds is the first launch by Portfolio Fund Managers. Tim Miller, the chairman, said: 'It is probably more risky to have nothing in emerging markets than to have up to 20 per cent of a portfolio in them.'

Richard Timberlake, the investment director, said the volatility of the stock markets could be modified by holding funds invested in many countries. The markets do not tend to move in line with each other.

The initial charge is 5 per cent for investments under pounds 5,000, but reduces in steps to zero when they exceed pounds 100,000. The annual charge is 1.2 per cent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in