Regulator rejects power protest
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An attempt by a US consumer group to block a bid by Southern Company for Britain's National Power has been thrown out by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
As a discouraged Southern delegation flew home at the weekend after being summarily rebuffed by National Power, it emerged that the company required special approval from the SEC to double the amount it can invest abroad to $3.4bn (pounds 2.3bn).
The Campaign for a Prosperous Georgia (CPG), a consumer pressure group in Southern's home state, unsuccessfully opposed the change saying it would reward the company for its "poor record on pollution", according to SEC documents obtained by the Independent on Sunday.
But even with the commission's favourable ruling in pocket, the plan to merge the two electricity giants could be still be abandoned because of opposition from National Power's board.
Although industry analysts are predicting a hostile bid, possibly priced as high as 700p per share, there is evidence that Southern was hoping to avoid a fight.
Unlike its last foray into the UK market, which began with a dawn raid for Sweb shares followed by a hostile takeover bid, the approach to National Power was intended to be friendly.
The Southern delegation met briefly last week with National Power's chairman, John Baker, but only had time to tell him that Southern had no intention of stripping the company down and milking it before the door to talks was slammed shut.
"They'll be thinking about it for a while," said one source close to the deal. "They're certainly not sharpening their knives. You may never hear from them again."
The approach - prompted by a sharp jump in National Power's share price on bid rumours - came during a break in Southern's attempts to raise interim finance in the City to back the deal.
But the timing of the whole project was dependent on the SEC's ruling earlier in the month that the company could continue its aggressive expansion.
Under the 60-year-old Public Utility Holding Company Act, it was limited to investing at most 50 per cent of its consolidated retained earnings in overseas ventures. It already has a portfolio - including Sweb - worth $1.2bn, just $480m below the old cap. Under the new limit it will be able to spend another $2.2bn
However, a hostile bid for National Power would probably cost more than pounds 8bn. The balance could be raised in equity and debt markets, as long as Southern's regulated operations at home are not put at risk.
The application for a change was endorsed by utility regulators in states where the company operates, but caused outrage among citizen activists at CPG.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments