Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Regulator opposes BAT's dollars 1bn acquisition plan

Larry Black
Thursday 15 September 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEW YORK - BAT's proposed dollars 1bn acquisition of American Tobacco is facing stiff resistance from the staff of the US Federal Trade Commission, writes Larry Black.

Members of the country's largest cigarette wholesalers group, the American Wholesale Marketing Association, confirmed they had received letters from the FTC suggesting the merger of the third- and fourth-ranking tobacco producers was anti-competitive, and soliciting evidence for an anti- trust case against the acquisition.

While BAT's Brown & Williamson Tobacco subsidiary and American Tobacco, a subsidiary of American Brands, account for only 18 per cent of the US market, they have a substantially larger share of the fast-growing discount- cigarettes business. Reports said the FTC letter included predictions that discount prices would rise as a result of the merger.

Neither company would comment on the FTC's remarks, which tobacco analysts say is unprecedented. Both reiterated their belief that the merger is 'pro- competitive, creating a more effective competition for Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds with their huge market shares'.

A spokesman for the wholesalers' association said the regulators' monopoly arguments were difficult for many distributors to accept, particularly as their own profit margins had been hurt by price wars.

Rising market shares for discount brands forced big cuts in the retail price of premium cigarette brands 18 months ago, they said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in