Regulator calls for break-up of Nuclear Electric
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.OFFER, the electricity industry regulator, yesterday called for the break-up of the state-owned Nuclear Electric company in order to increase competition in the electricity generating market.
The regulator also said there was no case for the Government to fund any new nuclear plants or to subsidise the industry in any way that might distort competition.
The recommendations from Professor Stephen Littlechild, the director-general of electricity supply, come in his submission to the Government's review of the nuclear sector. Nuclear Electric is lobbying for government approval for a new reactor, Sizewell C in Suffolk, which would need about pounds 1bn in public funds.
Professor Littlechild is concerned that Nuclear Electric, with about 25 per cent of the electricity generating market in England and Wales, has too much influence.
He expressed similar concerns about Scottish Nuclear, which generates much of the electricity north of the border.
He said: 'Given the significant market power of the two nuclear companies, and their opportunities to extend this, it is important to ensure that nuclear companies are not subsidised in such a way as to distort their output, pricing and investment decisions.'
He added that concerns about the scope for complex monopoly or collusion apply as much to Nuclear Electric as to National Power and PowerGen, the two privatised generators in England and Wales.
He also called on ministers to ease the burden on consumers by reducing the existing subsidy for Nuclear Electric. This is decided annually and amounts to pounds 1bn or more, raised through a levy on electricity bills. He would like this to be set in advance and reduced steadily until its expiry in 1998.
Professor Littlechild wants to see the privatisation of Nuclear Electric and Scottish Nuclear to force them to face up to private- sector financial disciplines. However, he suggests that Nuclear Electric's six Magnox reactors be kept as a separate public-sector company.
Nuclear Electric should also be made to give two of its five modern advanced gas cooled reactors to Scottish Nuclear, to increase competition further in England and Wales. In return, the Scottish company would have to give one plant to Nuclear Electric, which would then start to compete in Scotland.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments