Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rail sale is a threat to spending, report says

Christian Wolmar
Wednesday 28 October 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

INVESTMENT in railway infrastructure will fall dramatically, threatening the 30,000 jobs supplying the industry, unless the Government rethinks its privatisation policy, according to a report published yesterday, writes Christian Wolmar.

There will be little incentive to buy new rolling stock and the infrastructure is likely to deteriorate, the report, commissioned by Transport 2000, Eurotunnel and the Railway Industry Association, argues.

The report, Rail Privatisation: attractive investment or wishful thinking?, by the consultants Steer Davies Gleave, suggests that a 'planning and investment agency' should be created to avoid a hiatus in investment during the transition period before privatisation and to ensure a continued flow of funds after.

The authors claim that investment is already being affected by the uncertainties over privatisation and by the recession. Although spending on investment this year is at a record level, the figure is being skewed by spending on projects related to the Channel tunnel, while more mundane needs such as signalling are being ignored.

Under current plans, the first private sector franchises will become operational on the rail network by April 1994, but the authors say this was unlikely to bring about any immediate investment in new stock.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in