Prudential rejects regulation by PIA
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prudential Corporation, the strongest critic of the Personal Investment Authority, has finally rejected the new regulator and aims to seek direct supervision by the Securities and Investments Board, the senior financial watchdog.
The Treasury, the SIB and the PIA itself all described the Pru's move as regrettable. The Treasury said neither the PIA nor its timetable would be deflected by the Pru's decision.
Although the PIA has little enthusiastic support in the financial services industry, most critics seem set to join, albeit reluctantly. Scottish Amicable is the latest life insurer to apply despite misgivings about the composition of the PIA's board, which it believes represents a fundamental break with the concept of self-regulation that is required by law. Standard Life is expected to follow.
A key decision will be that of the Halifax Building Society, which has serious reservations about the PIA and doubts its ability to deliver higher standards. Some believe a rejection by Halifax could deal a critical blow to the PIA's credibility.
Mick Newmarch, Prudential's chief executive, said it did not believe the PIA could offer adequate and cost-effective saver protection.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments