Premium rise on the cards
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A RULING by the Court of Appeal that credit-card protection is not an insurance service and so not exempt from VAT could lead to an increase in premiums, writes Tim Cockerell.
The judgment, which upheld a ruling made by a VAT tribunal, dismissed a challenge from Card Protection Plan (CPP) that its service, used by Midland Bank and Marks & Spencer, solely involved the supply of insurance - on which VAT is not charged.
Mr Justice Popplewell found that CPP provides both insurance and a convenience, and is therefore liable for VAT.
Some other card-protection companies, such as Sentinel Card Services, which provides cover for Barclays, Lloyds and NatWest customers, have always paid VAT. The card-protection service costs about pounds 8 a year, but competitive pressure might prevent CPP from passing on the pounds 1.40 VAT cost.
CPP has 28 days in which to appeal. If it won, it would then be liable for the new 3 per cent tax on insurance premiums imposed by last week's Budget.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments