PowerGen faces pounds 39m pension bill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PowerGen is facing a pounds 39m bill from its company pension scheme in the latest twist to the long-running row over the use of pension fund surpluses in the privatised power industry. Chris Godsmark, Business Correspondent, reports on claims that PowerGen breached new rules which safeguard pension fund assets.
The setback for PowerGen follows the unsuccessful legal challenge earlier this year by National Grid and National Power pensioners, who claimed the companies had acted unlawfully when they used pension fund surpluses to help fund redundancy payments after privatisation.
Though the judge ruled against the pensioners, he also questioned the way National Power had spread the extra pensions cost of its redundancy programme by paying money into its fund in installments.
National Power reduced the cost to the company by offsetting any outstanding cash due against huge surpluses in its pension fund identified by actuaries each year.
It has since emerged that a further 10 power companies, including PowerGen, also used installments to spread their redundancy costs.
This policy has been challenged by Coopers & Lybrand, auditors to the PowerGen scheme and the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme, the industry- wide umbrella fund created at privatisation.
The annual report of the PowerGen fund, which has just been published, says pounds 39.1m of payments were outstanding at the end of March because of the way the company had spread the cost. The new advice by Coopers means the company could be forced to repay the cash as a lump sum, rather than offsetting the liability against any surplus discovered at the next valuation in April 1998.
The 11 companies affected by the auditors' ruling, including National Power and PowerGen, could have to pay a total of pounds 115m into their pension funds. However, PowerGen has the biggest deficit to make up.
Coopers said the latest legal advice argued that the company should have consulted the pension fund trustees before deciding to pay in installments. This new advice superceded previous legal opinions, which said the company did not need to tell the trustees. The auditors said the pounds 39m deficit also breached 1996 rules on investments held by occupational pensions schemes, because it was being being classed as a loan from the pension fund to the company.
The scheme report said the fund's trustees were "initiating discussion with PowerGen as to how the situation is to be remedied".
Lawyers acting for the industry are due to give a final verdict on the auditor's opinion in the new few weeks.
Meanwhile the National Power and National Grid pensioners are preparing to appeal against the High Court judgement.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments