Portable number plan attacked by Vodafone
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Vodafone, the UK's largest mobile phone operator, has launched an attack on plans by the telephones watchdog, Oftel, to allow customers to keep their existing phone number when they switch supplier.
In a submission to Oftel this week, Vodafone complained the proposals to introduce so-called "number portability" next year would "impose an arbitrary deadline" based on technical data which had not yet been given to the phone operators.
Oftel had suggested a temporary move towards portability, which could mean the original phone operator diverting the number to the new company. This would mean the customer had made two calls instead of one. Full mobile number portability is not due until 1999.
Alan Harper, Vodafone's commercial director, said the company could lose out from portability if customers were encouraged to move to other operators.
But he added: "We just don't understand what Oftel's solution is for next year and the timescale is unrealistic."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments