Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pool Re shows pounds 140m City bomb shortfall: Terrorism reinsurer not yet prepared to call on Government for funds

Paul Durman
Friday 22 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE COST of claims arising from last year's bombing of Bishopsgate in the City of London was pounds 140m more than Pool Re, the specialist terrorist reinsurer, collected in premiums.

Despite this shortfall in its first year of operation, Pool Re sees no need yet to call on the Government to make good the deficit. At the inception of Pool Re in December 1992, the Government agreed to act as 'reinsurer of last resort' to ensure businesses would still be able to obtain insurance cover against terrorist attack. Commercial reinsurers abandoned the market after the first City bombing, of St Mary Axe, in April 1992.

Keith Loney, Pool Re's company secretary, says the company will call on the Government only if it runs out of money. Since most of the pounds 360m claims on Pool Re have still to be settled, this threat is some way off.

According to the company's first annual report yesterday, the pounds 47.6m of claims paid last year were comfortably covered by premiums of pounds 222m.

Pool Re will be able to use premiums collected in this and future years, together with investment income, to pay outstanding claims. Another large and costly terrorist attack would make a call on the Government much more likely.

Mr Loney says Pool Re does not believe it is necessary to raise premium rates again. After the Bishopsgate attack, the Government insisted on sharp increases. Mr Loney says the rating review is continuing.

The total insured cost of the Bishopsgate bomb is estimated at about pounds 700m. However, nearly half of this falls on other insurers.

Some did not have reinsurance cover while others were still protected by the tail-end of reinsurance contracts arranged before the St Mary Axe bomb.

Pool Re is a mutual owned by its 217 members, including 88 Lloyd's syndicates. Of 129 company members, 29 are incorporated outside the UK.

The pounds 222m premium income is much less than the pounds 350m-a-year envisaged for Pool Re. Although businesses have mostly taken out terrorism insurance in London and other metropolitan areas, the take- up in provincial areas has been more modest.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in