Parker Pen deal cleared
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GILLETTE'S proposed acquisition of Parker Pen was given the go-ahead yesterday by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, writes Tom Stevenson. Its report said the merger of Parker with Gillette's two pen brands, Waterman and Paper Mate, would not affect competition.
The MMC report expressed concern about pen suppliers deploying their own staff in shops without identifying them as such. Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, warned that the Office of Fair Trading would be investigating the practice.
Waterman and Paper Mate would add about 7 per cent to Parker's 50 per cent share of the UK market for refillable pens, according to the MMC. It decided that the bargaining power of the large retailers would constrain any attempt to exploit the position.
The pounds 285m deal will make multi-millionaires of Parker's management, who invested pounds 300,000 in a pounds 35m management buyout seven years ago.
Thirty top executives will share about pounds 90m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments