Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: The Pru loses an original

Tuesday 24 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Even today, the resignation of such an important City figure as the Pru's chief executive is a pretty seismic event. Ten years ago it would have registered force 10 on the Richter scale. Add to that the total lack of any adequate explanation for his going, and to the outside world it begins to look as if Britain's leading life assurance company must be in a state of disarray and chaos. Whatever the immediate reasons for his departure, Mick Newmarch will go down in City history as the man who was right at the wrong time. He said in speech after speech that the Personal Investment Authority, the regulator set up to combine the jobs of the old Fimbra and Lautro, was an unsatisfactory hybrid. On the Newmarch view, when the chips are down, self-regulation and self-interest can too often be synonymous. They may lead to an unholy mess from which nobody gains and from which the industry suffers because it is doubly blamed for failures in service towards customers.

Better therefore to make regulation a clear government responsibility, which means in the case of the PIA that it should have direct statutory powers. At present, it is a junior regulator, with powers delegated to it by the Securities and Investments Board. Mr Newmarch stood out to the last against joining the PIA as other opponents caved in, leaving the Pru forced to ask for direct regulation by SIB.

But like all originals, Mick Newmarch did not know when to stop. There was little point in being the lone outsider. He should have given in gracefully when all his allies deserted him.

Likewise, he battled for months on a pointless campaign to prove that the Pru was not being investigated for misselling of pensions, when the fact was that an informal investigation was under way. Mr Newmarch relied on the fine distinction between formaland informal to prove his point.

The full story of his abrupt departure has yet to emerge, but these lost battles are important clues to his character. Back to the wall, fed up with other people's weak compromises, he could very well have decided enough was enough and walked out.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in