Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: `Rip-off' Britain

Monday 09 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE TEETH of the Competition Act grow sharper by the day. This piece of putative legislation slipped largely unnoticed on to the agenda when Margaret Beckett unveiled it in Labour's first year in power. But now, under Stephen Byers and backed by the "Rip-Off" Britain bandwagon, it is front page news.

The level of interest is no surprise given the powers available under the act. With the OFT able to fine firms 30 per cent of their turnover, the sums are enormous. And in targeting specific industries such as supermarkets, banks and the car makers, he has chosen powerful enemies

But. Is the OFT really going to turn round and fine Tesco pounds 5bn for abuse of market power?

It is possible that the mere threat may be enough both to change corporate practices and increase consumer pressure for a better deal. It is ludicrous to suggest, as some newspapers have, that excess profits will always be competed away by new entrants. We do not live in a world of perfect competition and every businessman would love a monopoly given half a chance. Threats can work and the history of competition inquiries shows that sectors being investigated often sharpen-up their acts even before the process has run its course.

Whether Mr Byers blanket approach will prove workable remains to be seen. There are clearly "rogue" sectors like the car industry where restricted distribution through approved dealers keeps prices artificially high.

But the attack on the UK supermarkets, though no less valid, may prove to be superfluous. This is a sector where market forces are already doing the government's dirty work for it. The supermarkets have got themselves into such a tizzy over Wal-Mart's takeover of Asda that they are falling over each other to lower prices.

As a shot across the bows Mr Byers actions are laudable. Whether it all works in practice is less certain. It will take years before any case comes before the courts. All good news for the lawyers, of course. But the US is clearly the government's model and anything that places more power in the hands of consumers should be welcomed

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in