Outlook: Real choice for pay-TV viewers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.COUCH potatoes should applaud . After 18 months of investigation the Independent Television Commission has finally concluded that pay-television consumers are best served if they can choose which channels they want to subscribe to.
After all, it was always a nonsense that they be required to take a package that included the Weather Channel or the Carlton Food Network when all they really wanted was the football on Sky Sports. By introducing real choice the ITC has ensured that channels that no-one wants to watch will either have to smarten up their act or wither and die.
But what about BSkyB? Until now, the practice of bundling has allowed Rupert Murdoch's broadcaster to charge equal amounts for channels with such varying appeal as Sky One (which is popular) and Sky News (which is not). Yesterday's changes mean Sky will have to start charging the full whack for the popular channels. Will the viewers accept it? Watch this space.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments