Outlook: Plan B for Smiths is not much better
Outlook on attitudes to monetary union, the WH SMith proposals and the new bid for mci
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tim Waterstone has returned with Plan B for his putative takeover of WH Smith. Under the proposals sketched out yesterday, the debt levels will be lower, there is a far more realistic valuation of his Daisy & Tom business, which now appears to be worth only a quarter of its value a fortnight ago, and the advisers fees will be lower. Mr Waterstone is also proposing to tinker with the boardroom structure so that instead of installing himself as chief executive over the head of Richard Handover, he would become deputy chairman with Mr Handover staying put
However, for all the rearranging of the deck chairs, Plan B is not a decisive improvement on his first stab at a leveraged takeover. Smiths shareholders are still being bribed with their own money and asked to put their faith in a much more highly geared vehicle.
Nor does it look likely that the incumbent management will settle down to a life of harmonious co-existence with the man who was trying to snatch their company from under them a few days ago
If Mr Waterstone's ideas of a capital repayment coupled with a break- up of the business are so attractive to shareholders, then why doesn't the existing management implement them and dispense with the fancy fees that SBC Warburg will ring up?
Smith's probably has a duty to put the Waterstone proposals to its annual meeting next Wednesday and let shareholders have their say.
Having missed his opportunity to strike when the ship was rudderless, the most galling thing for Mr Waterstone would be either to see the incumbent management copy his ideas or discover that he had spurred them into action. That, however, if often the fate of the interloper.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments