OUTLOOK: No spark to the power sell-off
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The £4bn sale of National Power and PowerGen is finally under way with all the familiar bells, whistles and razzmatazz. On the face of it, there is not a lot to differentiate this campaign from previous ones. Share shops and discounts for private investors are now commonplace in government share issues. So too is price-setting by an international process of bidding by institutions.
The advertising may be better than the disastrous Inspector Morose campaign launched for BT3, but in other respects it looks like being an equally unexciting investment prospect. A market price for the shares already exists. Unlike the original sale in 1991, the companies have a track record already reflected in the price. The upshot is that this time round the generators will not provide the guaranteed privatisation bonanza of yesteryear. If BT3 is anthying to go by, investors will lose money in the short to medium term.
The fact that the Government agreed to allow National Power and PowerGen to buy up to 8 per cent of their respective shares as part of the international offer suggests there was a fear that, otherwise, it would have been hard to get the thing away.
The Government's advisers strongly reject this notion. They argue that the move is good because it will enhance earnings per share. It does nevertheless provide a cushion, should demand not be all that the Treasury might wish.
There is also a hefty 40 per cent set aside for private investors, and more if demand from the UK public is very strong. Some might be put off by the high expected minimum investment of about £1,000 The reason given for this is that the package sold to the public will contain shares in both companies.
It nevertheless suggests that, in the public offer at least, the Government is more interested this time round in deeper rather than wider share ownership.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments