Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: Liffe will have to change quickly

Wednesday 08 April 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT'S A FUNNY thing about the City, but this hugely successful, highly innovative, dynamo of modern capitalism has a big problem with change. Its institutions and markets don't like it; invariably they have to be pushed into necessary reform by policy-makers, regulators and other outsiders, and they always do it grudgingly, under protest. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that left to its own devices, the City would long ago have assigned itself to the dustbin of history as a leading financial centre.

Thus the Stock Exchange had to be forced by the government of the day into abolition of fixed commissions and dual capacity. Later, order-driven trading had to be bulldozed through the powerful vested interests that stood in its path. Much the same is true of the City's other leading markets.

The London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange (Liffe) seems to be another case in point. This has been an undeniably successful market since it was established some 15 years ago, and it continues to grow like Topsy. Just recently, however, it has been overtaken by the Deutsche Terminborse in Frankfurt on the key bund futures contract. While this is only one of a large number of futures contracts, many of which are still overwhelming dominated by Liffe, it is the most widely traded in Europe and it could be a harbinger of things to come.

Liffe has not only been slow to respond to this competitive challenge; for a long time it positively resisted the screen-based trading systems that would enable an adequate response. The reasons for this are many and varied but the most important is that the market is mutually owned by its members. Many of these are so called "locals", individual freelance traders with a big vested interest in the present, open outcry method of trading. Their livelihoods and jobs depend on it, and as a result they have been behaving like modern luddites.

The necessary screen-based, open-access systems will probably be voted through at next month's extraordinary meeting, but it has taken a wave of adverse publicity, the resignation of a board member and a serious thrashing by the Germans to make it happen.

It is vital, then, that the exchange moves swiftly to deal with the nub of the problem - slow, too little too late, decision making caused by mutual ownership. Separation of ownership from membership through a stock market flotation should be put forward not just as an option at next month's meeting, but posed as a vital necessity. Liffe has become too important a market to be held back by vested interest.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in